Fair HousingIntermediateArizona Exam

An Arizona landlord who advertises 'no Section 8' is:

AAlways permissible under federal and Arizona state law, since neither the Fair Housing Act nor Arizona's fair housing statute includes source of income as a protected class
BPotentially illegal in localities that have adopted source of income protections, and may also reflect discriminatory intent based on other protected classesCorrect
CA protected exercise of the landlord's property management rights, since federal law has never required private landlords to participate in any housing assistance program
DRequired by Arizona state statute, which mandates that all residential landlords accept Housing Choice Vouchers as a condition of holding a valid Arizona rental license

Why Potentially illegal in localities that have adopted source of income protections, and may also reflect discriminatory intent based on other protected classes Is Correct

Answer B: Potentially illegal in localities that have adopted source of income protections, and may also reflect discriminatory intent based on other protected classes

While source of income is not a federal Fair Housing Act protected class, some Arizona localities protect it. Additionally, 'no Section 8' policies may have disparate impact on racial minorities, raising FHA concerns even without explicit source of income protection.

Exam Tip: Fair Housing

Fair Housing questions test both federal (Fair Housing Act of 1968) and state-level protected classes. The federal protected classes are race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, and disability. Many states add additional protections.

Key Fair Housing Terms in This Question

People Also Study

Study This Topic

Practice More Arizona Real Estate Questions

1,400+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.

Take the Free Arizona Quiz →