Fair Housing
The intent element in a fair housing discrimination claim:
AMust always be proven for the claim to succeed
BIs not required when the plaintiff proves disparate impact (discriminatory effect) theory✓ Correct
CIs irrelevant in all fair housing cases
DMust be proven beyond a reasonable doubt
Explanation
Fair housing claims can succeed under disparate treatment (intent to discriminate required) OR disparate impact (discriminatory effect, no intent required). Disparate impact does not require proof of discriminatory motive.
Related Arkansas Fair Housing Questions
- Blockbusting (panic peddling) is a Fair Housing violation that involves:
- Which statement about sex discrimination in housing under the Fair Housing Act is most accurate?
- A real estate agent is showing properties to a buyer who is a veteran. The agent avoids showing homes in neighborhoods with few veterans. This is:
- The penalty for a real estate licensee found in violation of the Arkansas fair housing laws by AREC may include:
- The maximum civil penalty for a first-time Fair Housing Act violation adjudicated by HUD is:
- Restrictive covenants based on race that were recorded in older deeds are:
- A real estate salesperson shows homes in different price ranges to buyers of different races who have identical financial qualifications. This is an example of:
- The Civil Rights Act of 1866 prohibits discrimination based on:
Practice More Arkansas Real Estate Questions
1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.
Take the Free Arkansas Quiz →