Fair Housing

What is 'disparate treatment' in fair housing law and how does it differ from disparate impact?

ADisparate treatment and disparate impact are legally identical theories
BDisparate treatment involves intentional discrimination based on protected characteristics; disparate impact involves facially neutral policies that disproportionately harm protected classes without requiring proof of intent✓ Correct
CDisparate treatment applies only to commercial transactions; disparate impact to residential
DDisparate treatment requires statistical evidence; disparate impact requires direct evidence of intent

Explanation

Disparate treatment is intentional discrimination — treating a person less favorably because of their protected class (refusing to show a Black buyer the same properties shown to a white buyer). Disparate impact focuses on the discriminatory effects of neutral policies (a minimum income requirement that screens out more minority applicants). Both theories can establish fair housing violations in Pennsylvania. Disparate treatment requires proof of discriminatory intent; disparate impact requires statistical evidence of disproportionate harm and can be defended by showing business necessity.

Related Pennsylvania Fair Housing Questions

Practice More Pennsylvania Real Estate Questions

1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.

Take the Free Pennsylvania Quiz →