Fair Housing
In South Dakota, which of the following constitutes a fair housing violation?
ARequiring all applicants to complete the same rental application
BRunning a credit check on all prospective tenants using a uniform standard
CAdvertising a two-bedroom apartment as suitable for 'small families only'✓ Correct
DCharging a refundable pet deposit for tenants with pets
Explanation
Advertising a unit as suitable for 'small families only' could be interpreted as discrimination against families with children (familial status) or as an attempt to limit the family size protected under the Fair Housing Act. Consistent application processes and credit checks are lawful if applied uniformly.
Related South Dakota Fair Housing Questions
- In South Dakota, what does 'undue hardship' mean in the context of fair housing reasonable accommodation requests?
- The Fair Housing Act's disability protections cover which types of disability?
- In South Dakota, the 'interactive process' required by fair housing in disability accommodations means:
- A South Dakota landlord who verbally agrees to rent an apartment to a Hispanic applicant, then calls back saying it was rented to someone else (when it wasn't), has potentially committed:
- In South Dakota, which scenario would most likely NOT constitute a fair housing violation?
- In South Dakota, which statement about the Fair Housing Act's coverage of disability is correct?
- A South Dakota property manager refuses to rent to a family because they have young children. This is a violation of the Fair Housing Act because families with children are protected under which class?
- In South Dakota, which protected class was added to the Fair Housing Act in 1988?
Practice More South Dakota Real Estate Questions
1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.
Take the Free South Dakota Quiz →