Fair Housing
In Alaska, which statement about source-of-income discrimination is correct?
ARefusing a tenant who uses a housing voucher is permissible under federal law
BSource of income is not a protected class under federal Fair Housing law, but some states and localities have added it✓ Correct
CSection 8 voucher holders may be refused by landlords if the property is in poor condition
DAll landlords must accept housing vouchers regardless of property condition
Explanation
Source of income (including housing vouchers/Section 8) is not a federally protected class under the Fair Housing Act. However, several states and municipalities have added it as a protected class — Alaska licensees should verify current local laws.
Related Alaska Fair Housing Questions
- In Alaska, the fair housing protected class of 'color' is distinct from 'race' because it:
- A property manager in Alaska who requires a larger security deposit from tenants with service animals compared to tenants without pets is:
- Under the Fair Housing Act, which of the following best describes 'quid pro quo' sexual harassment in housing?
- In Alaska, an online real estate listing platform that uses algorithms to show different property listings to users based on their perceived race or national origin would be:
- The federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 (as amended) prohibits discrimination based on which protected classes?
- An Alaska property manager is required to provide a reasonable accommodation to a tenant with a disability. A reasonable accommodation is:
- Alaska state fair housing law adds which protected class(es) beyond the federal Fair Housing Act?
- In Alaska, which of the following fair housing practices involves the most nuanced analysis?
Practice More Alaska Real Estate Questions
1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.
Take the Free Alaska Quiz →