Fair HousingAdvancedArizona Exam

In Arizona, which of the following is NOT a valid defense to a fair housing complaint?

AThe respondent had no discriminatory intent
BThe policy serves a legitimate business necessity
CThe complainant was actually unqualified on objective criteria
DThe respondent was following the client's discriminatory instructionsCorrect

Why The respondent was following the client's discriminatory instructions Is Correct

Answer D: The respondent was following the client's discriminatory instructions

Following discriminatory instructions from a client is NOT a valid defense. An agent who carries out discriminatory instructions is personally liable.

Exam Tip: Fair Housing

Fair Housing questions test both federal (Fair Housing Act of 1968) and state-level protected classes. The federal protected classes are race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, and disability. Many states add additional protections.

Key Fair Housing Terms in This Question

People Also Study

Practice More Arizona Real Estate Questions

1,400+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.

Take the Free Arizona Quiz →