Contracts

What is 'unconscionability' in a Pennsylvania real estate contract and when might a court refuse to enforce it?

AAny contract where one party earns more than 5× what they invested
BA contract or clause that is so one-sided, oppressive, or unfair that a court may refuse to enforce it, particularly when there is a significant disparity in bargaining power✓ Correct
CA PREC rule making certain commission structures unenforceable
DPennsylvania courts never refuse to enforce signed contracts on unconscionability grounds

Explanation

Unconscionability is an equitable doctrine allowing courts to refuse enforcement of contracts (or specific clauses) that are shockingly unfair due to: procedural unconscionability (unfair bargaining process, exploitation of weakness, lack of meaningful choice) and substantive unconscionability (terms so one-sided they shock the conscience). Pennsylvania courts rarely apply unconscionability to arm's-length commercial transactions but may apply it to consumer contracts where sophisticated parties exploit vulnerable ones — such as predatory land installment contracts targeting low-income buyers.

People Also Study

Practice More Pennsylvania Real Estate Questions

1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.

Take the Free Pennsylvania Quiz →