Land Use & Zoning
A Virginia private property owner claims that a new cell tower placed near their property constitutes a regulatory taking because it lowered their property value. Their legal theory is:
AVariance denial
BInverse condemnation or diminution in value claim✓ Correct
CZoning appeal
DAn administrative complaint
Explanation
A diminution-in-value claim or inverse condemnation argues that government action (approving a cell tower) reduced property value sufficiently to require compensation. These claims are difficult to win unless all value is eliminated.
Related Virginia Land Use & Zoning Questions
- In Virginia's Richmond metro market, urban infill development refers to:
- Virginia's Chesapeake Bay Act applies in 'Tidewater Virginia,' which includes:
- The Virginia Statewide Building Code (USBC) is administered at the local level by:
- Virginia's Wetlands Conservation Act provides that:
- A Virginia property developer who builds houses in a floodway is most likely violating:
- A Virginia property in a historic district may require approval from a Historic District Review Board (Architectural Review Board) before:
- A Virginia developer who agrees to add affordable housing units in exchange for additional density beyond what zoning normally allows is engaged in:
- A Virginia locality imposes a development impact fee on new construction to pay for roads and schools. This fee is an example of:
Practice More Virginia Real Estate Questions
1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.
Take the Free Virginia Quiz →