Property Management

In Nevada, what is the difference between 'wear and tear' and property damage when evaluating a tenant's responsibility?

AThere is no legal distinction; tenants are responsible for everything
BNormal wear and tear (gradual deterioration from ordinary use) cannot be charged to tenants; actual damage beyond normal use can be deducted from the security deposit✓ Correct
CTenants are responsible for all wear and tear but not structural damage
DNevada law defines damage as anything costing more than $500 to repair

Explanation

Nevada law distinguishes between normal wear and tear (expected, gradual deterioration from ordinary use — e.g.

People Also Study

Practice More Nevada Real Estate Questions

1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.

Take the Free Nevada Quiz →