Environmental
A Vermont property owner discovers asbestos-containing floor tiles when renovating a pre-1980 building. The tiles are intact and undisturbed. The recommended approach is:
AImmediately remove them without any precautions
BLeave them in place (encapsulate) if in good condition, as intact asbestos-containing materials typically present lower risk than disturbed materials✓ Correct
CApply for an Act 250 permit before any action
DReport immediately to Vermont's Attorney General
Explanation
Intact, undisturbed asbestos-containing materials present relatively low risk compared to friable (crumbling) or disturbed materials. Vermont and federal guidance generally recommend encapsulation or leaving intact ACMs in place when they are in good condition. Disturbance should involve licensed abatement contractors.
Related Vermont Environmental Questions
- Vermont requires testing and disclosure for which environmental hazard in homes built before 1978?
- Vermont's 'environmental covenant' on a remediated property restricts:
- CERCLA (Superfund) holds which parties potentially liable for hazardous waste cleanup costs?
- Vermont's 'stormwater permit' requirements primarily apply to development projects that disturb more than how many acres of land?
- Vermont's 'phosphorus reduction credits' trading in the Lake Champlain basin allows:
- Vermont is known for having lead in older homes. Federal law requires disclosure of known lead-based paint hazards for homes built before:
- Vermont's 'solid waste management district' programs may affect property values near:
- Vermont's 'innocent landowner defense' under CERCLA requires the property owner to prove they:
Practice More Vermont Real Estate Questions
1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.
Take the Free Vermont Quiz →