Land Use & ZoningIntermediateDelaware Exam

What is 'downzoning' versus 'upzoning' in terms of regulatory takings concerns?

AUpzoning always triggers mandatory government compensation to neighbors; downzoning never requires any compensation to the affected owner, though many experienced professionals would note some exceptions depending on the circumstances
BDownzoning (restricting development intensity) may constitute a regulatory taking requiring compensation if it deprives the owner of all economically beneficial use; upzoning (increasing intensity) generally requires no compensationCorrect
CBoth always require compensation under the Fifth Amendment
DNeither requires compensation as long as some beneficial use remains

Why Downzoning (restricting development intensity) may constitute a regulatory taking requiring compensation if it deprives the owner of all economically beneficial use; upzoning (increasing intensity) generally requires no compensation Is Correct

Answer B: Downzoning (restricting development intensity) may constitute a regulatory taking requiring compensation if it deprives the owner of all economically beneficial use; upzoning (increasing intensity) generally requires no compensation

A regulatory taking occurs when government land use restrictions go so far as to deprive an owner of all economically beneficial use (per Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council).

Key Land Use & Zoning Terms in This Question

People Also Study

Study This Topic

Practice More Delaware Real Estate Questions

1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.

Take the Free Delaware Quiz →