Fair Housing

A Mississippi lender uses a credit scoring model that was validated for the general population but disproportionately screens out minority applicants. HUD's position is that this may constitute:

ALegal and appropriate use of objective financial criteria
BDisparate impact discrimination if the scoring model has not been validated to predict creditworthiness for all groups without a less discriminatory alternative✓ Correct
CIntentional disparate treatment discrimination
DPermissible redlining

Explanation

Under the Fair Housing Act's disparate impact standard, even facially neutral criteria like credit scoring models can be challenged if they disproportionately harm a protected class without sufficient justification and no less discriminatory alternative exists.

People Also Study

Study This Topic

Practice More Mississippi Real Estate Questions

1,500+ questions covering all exam topics. Start free — no signup required.

Take the Free Mississippi Quiz →